Alpha Calculator (Investment)
Alpha measures the portion of a portfolio or asset return that is not explained by market movements or a benchmark model. Different alpha calculations exist for single-period comparisons, regression-based estimates, and multi-period annualized excess returns.
This tool supports multiple validated methods so you can choose the calculation that matches your data: single-period CAPM comparison, Jensen-style calculations using regression summary statistics, or annualized excess from cumulative returns. It includes guidance on input formats and accuracy considerations.
Calculates alpha as actual asset return minus the CAPM-expected return using a supplied beta. Enter percentage values (e.g., 8 for 8%).
Inputs
Results
Alpha (CAPM) (%)
2.00%
| Output | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha (CAPM) (%) | 2.00% | % |
Visualization
Methodology
CAPM single-period alpha is the observed return minus the CAPM-expected return: Alpha = R_p - [R_f + β (R_m - R_f)]. Use this when you have a single observed asset return, a market return, a risk-free rate, and a beta.
Jensen-style alpha here uses supplied summary regression outputs (estimated beta and mean periodic returns). For rigorous regression-based inference, perform a time-series regression of asset excess returns on market excess returns and supply the estimated beta and mean returns from that analysis.
Annualized excess alpha converts cumulative total returns to annualized returns using geometric annualization and reports the difference. This is appropriate when comparing multi-period total returns across different horizons.
Worked examples
Example 1 (CAPM single-period): Asset return = 12%, Market = 7%, Risk-free = 1.5%, Beta = 1.2. Expected CAPM return = 1.5% + 1.2*(7% - 1.5%) = 8.7%. Alpha = 12% - 8.7% = 3.3%.
Example 2 (Annualized): Asset cumulative return = 0.50 (50%) over 4 years, Benchmark cumulative = 0.30 (30%). Annualized asset = (1.50)^(1/4)-1 = 10.67%. Annualized benchmark = (1.30)^(1/4)-1 = 6.78%. Annualized alpha = 3.89%.
Key takeaways
Choose the method that matches your data: single-period CAPM for point-in-time comparisons, Jensen-style for regression-derived estimates, and annualized excess for multi-period cumulative returns.
Ensure periodicity alignment and data provenance. For formal reporting and trading or advisory decisions, retain regression diagnostics and data lineage, and follow organizational validation and control processes.
Further resources
Expert Q&A
What input formats should I use?
For single-period and mean returns, enter percentage numbers (e.g., 8 for 8%). For cumulative multi-period returns used in annualized mode, enter decimal fractions (e.g., 0.35 for 35%). Beta and estimated regression coefficients are plain numeric values (e.g., 1.05).
When should I use the Jensen-style method?
Use Jensen-style when you have regression outputs (estimated beta and mean periodic returns) from a time-series regression of asset excess returns on market excess returns. That preserves statistical estimation steps and standard error reporting in your source regression.
Does this tool run regressions on raw time-series data?
No. This tool accepts summary statistics and single-period figures. For full regression analysis, use a statistical package, export the estimated beta and summary statistics, then input the estimates here. Methodology guidance in this page explains required steps.
How accurate are the results?
Calculations are deterministic given your inputs, but accuracy depends on data quality, correct periodicity alignment, and appropriate model choice. See the accuracy and validation section and consult time-series regression diagnostics for inference.
Are there regulatory or standards considerations?
Use documented procedures for data handling, model validation, and controls. Follow applicable standards for data integrity and process controls cited below for traceability and reproducibility.
Sources & citations
- NIST — Frameworks and best practices for data integrity and controls — https://www.nist.gov
- ISO — Standards overview (quality and information security controls) — https://www.iso.org
- IEEE — Best practices for measurements and reporting — https://www.ieee.org
- OSHA — Operational risk controls and workplace safety guidance (for operational alpha contexts) — https://www.osha.gov